Studies in Logical Theory · John Dewey
SOPHISTS, THE, 225.
SPENCER, H., 248, 250 note 1, 315 note. STANDARD (see also Predicate): identified with predicate in ethical judgment, 238-40; function of, in ethical judgment, 274, 299, 300; morphology and mode of reconstruction of, 296, 297; an ultimate ethical, impossible, 299; objectivity of, 300, 301. STIMULUS: of thought, 7, 8, 17, 24, 37-40, 47, 81; Lotze's view of, 27, 29, 30; view criticised, 30-36; confusion of datum with, 61; defined, 75; and judgment, 153-4; as condition of thinking, 193 ff.; as direct and indirect, 195-7; of ethical judgment, 238-41, 291; of economic, judgment, 241-6, 302; (see Content, Datum). STOUT, G. F.: referred to, 349. STRATTON, G. M., 318 note. STRUCTURE, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, 75; (see Function). SUBJECT: of judgment, how constituted, 75 note; as constructed by thought, 94 ff., 103; as a part of judgment, 118 ff.; as reality, 88 ff.; as inside and outside of judgment, 93, 96; functional theory of, 111, 125; as that requiring explanation, 208, 211 ff.; as modified by deduction, 212; given by analysis of situation, 232; interacts with predicate in judgment, 232; of ethical judgment, 258, 296-8; of economic judgment, 259, 260, 304, 309-11; (see Copula, Datum, Judgment, Predicate). SUBJECTIVE: distinguished from objective, 25; Lotze's view of impressions as purely, 27, 28; view criticised, 31; definition of, 39; developed only within reflection, 52, 53; (see Psychical). SUBJECTIVISM: in Lotze, 83, 84; in Royce, 360. SUBJECT-MATTER OF THOUGHT: distinguished as stimulus, datum, and content, 7, 8, 24; confusion of these (genetic) distinctions, 17, 18; as antecedent, Study II; as datum, Study III; as content, Study IV. SUBSTANCE: ethical theories based on logic involved in rationalistic conception of, 298, 299; meaning of concept of, 326, 327; type-form of conduct analogous to concept of a particular kind of, 327, 328. SUBSTANTIATION: significance of Plato's, of ideas, 342 ff.
Text from Project Gutenberg, public domain in the United States.