A Pluralistic Universe · William James
LECTURE II
Note 1, page 50.--The difference is that the bad parts of this finite are eternal and essential for absolutists, whereas pluralists may hope that they will eventually get sloughed off and become as if they had not been. Note 2, page 51.--Quoted by W. Wallace: _Lectures and Essays_, Oxford, 1898, p. 560. Note 3, page 51.--_Logic_, tr. Wallace, 1874, p. 181. Note 4, page 52.--_Ibid._, p. 304. Note 5, page 53.--_Contemporary Review_, December, 1907, vol. 92, p. 618. Note 6, page 57.--_Metaphysic_, sec. 69 ff. Note 7, page 62.--_The World and the Individual_, vol. i, pp. 131-132. Note 8, page 67.--A good illustration of this is to be found in a controversy between Mr. Bradley and the present writer, in _Mind_ for 1893, Mr. Bradley contending (if I understood him rightly) that 'resemblance' is an illegitimate category, because it admits of degrees, and that the only real relations in comparison are absolute identity and absolute non-comparability. Note 9, page 75.--_Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic_, p. 184. Note 10, page 75.--_Appearance and Reality_, 1893, pp. 141-142. Note 11, page 76.--Cf. _Elements of Metaphysics_, p. 88. Note 12, page 77.--_Some Dogmas of Religion_, p. 184. Note 13, page 80.--For a more detailed criticism of Mr. Bradley's intellectualism, see Appendix A.
Text from Project Gutenberg, public domain in the United States.