PhiloWikiConceptsPhilosophersBooksInteractive graph

Concept

Classification

Overview

process of grouping of objects into classes

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

In the original texts

Passages from public-domain books where Classification is discussed.

  1. Classification is necessary. But unless you can progress from classification to mathematics, your reasoning will not take you very far.

    Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the modern world

    states what it is; names the idea; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  2. Whence it follows that the advance of classification is necessarily proportionate to the advance of generalisations. Yet further, the notion of _likeness_, both in things and relations, simultaneously evolves by one process of culture the ideas of _equality_ of things and _equality_ of relations; which are the respective bases of…

    Herbert Spencer, Essays on education and kindred subjects

    names the idea; states what it is; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  3. In the other, the arrangement and distribution are the main object, and the naming is secondary to, and purposely conforms itself to, instead of governing, that more important operation. Classification, thus regarded, is a contrivance for the best possible ordering of the ideas of objects in our minds; for causing the ideas to accompany or succeed one another in such a way as shall give us the greatest command over…

    John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive

    names the idea; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  4. What now is the mental process by which classification is effected? Manifestly it is a recognition of the _likeness_ or _unlikeness_ of things, either in respect of their sizes, colours, forms, weights, textures, tastes, &c., or in respect of their modes of action.

    Herbert Spencer, Illustrations of Universal Progress

    names the idea; states what it is; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  5. Thus "perspectives" and "things" are merely two different ways of classifying particulars. It is to be observed that there is no _a priori_ necessity for particulars to be susceptible of this double classification. There may be what might be called "wild" particulars, not having the usual relations by which the classification is effected; perhaps dreams and hallucinations are composed of particulars which are "wild"…

    Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays

    states what it is; names the idea

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Philosophers who discussed Classification

Related ideas

Opposing perspectives

Place in the tradition

Part of Alphabetical order.

Explore Classification in the interactive graph →