Concept
Double-aspect theory

Overview
theory in the philosophy of mind
Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).
Possible passages
Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.
Now, as perception is the basis of all knowledge, all thinking and all insight must be influenced by this fundamental difference in the quality of it, from which arises that complete difference between the ordinary and the superior mind in their whole way of viewing things, which may be noticed on all occasions. From this also proceeds the dull gravity, nearly resembling that of animals, which characterizes…
Arthur Schopenhauer, On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, and On the Will in Nature
The author is tied to Double-aspect theory in the knowledge graph.
The first is determinant and formative; it gives ideas "the shape without which the logical spirit could not accept them." In a way it dictates "its own laws to its object-matter."[36] The second activity of thought is rather passive and receptive. It simply recognizes what is already there.
John Dewey, Studies in Logical Theory
Close in meaning to Double-aspect theory; the term itself is not named.
On the other hand, if we refuse to recognize the advent here of a new category, intelligence becomes an anomaly and mystery deepens into contradiction. Since intelligence or consciousness must be provided for somehow, we are forced back upon either interactionism or else epiphenomenalism, more or less disguised under a euphonious name, such as psycho-physical parallelism or the double-aspect theory. That is, the…
John Dewey, Creative Intelligence
Names Double-aspect theory.
Related ideas
- Mind–body dualism
- David Bohm
- Thomas Nagel
- Mind
- Gustav Fechner
- George Henry Lewes
- Neutral monism
- Nature
- Quantum mechanics
- David Chalmers
- Baruch Spinoza
- John Polkinghorne
- Philosophy of mind
- Arthur Schopenhauer
- Will (philosophy)
- Thomas Jay Oord
- Complementarity (physics)
Opposing perspectives
Place in the tradition
Part of Materialism.