Concept
Nuclear disarmament

Overview
Nuclear disarmament is the act of reducing or eliminating nuclear weapons. Its end state can also be a nuclear-weapons-free world, in which nuclear weapons are completely eliminated. The term denuclearization is also used to describe the process leading to complete nuclear disarmament.
Disarmament and non-proliferation treaties have been agreed upon because of the extreme danger intrinsic to nuclear war and the possession of nuclear weapons.
Proponents of nuclear disarmament say that it would lessen the probability of nuclear war occurring, especially considering accidents or retaliatory strikes from false alarms. Critics of nuclear disarmament say that it would undermine deterrence and make conventional wars more common.
Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).
Possible passages
Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.
A great many “elements” have been shown by Dr. F. W. Aston to be really mixtures of isotopes, which can be sorted out by ingenious methods. All this, but more especially the transmutation of elements in radio-activity, led to the conclusion that what had been called “atoms” were really complex structures, which could change into atoms of a different sort by losing a part. After various attempts to imagine the…
Bertrand Russell, Philosophy
States what Nuclear disarmament is; the author is tied to Nuclear disarmament in the knowledge graph.
The principal source of the harm done by the State is the fact that power is its chief end. This is not the case in America, because America is safe against aggression;[8] but in all other great nations the chief aim of the State is to possess the greatest possible amount of external force. To this end, the liberty of the citizens is curtailed, and anti-militarist propaganda is severely punished.
Bertrand Russell, Why Men Fight
The author is tied to Nuclear disarmament in the knowledge graph.
This spontaneous fission, which we have seen to be, in all cases, more or less destructive of individual life, is simply a cessation in the co-ordination of actions. From the single cell, the halves of whose nucleus, instead of continuing to act together, begin to repel each other, fly apart, establish distinct centres of assimilation, and finally cause the cell to divide; up to the Annelidan, whose string of…
Herbert Spencer, The Principles of Biology, Volume 1
Close in meaning to Nuclear disarmament; the term itself is not named.
Philosophers who discussed Nuclear disarmament
Related ideas
- Washington, D.C.
- India
- University of Notre Dame
- Iran
- Japan
- The Wall Street Journal
- South Africa
- Libya
- Los Angeles
- The Guardian
- Norway
- North Korea
- Newsweek
- New Mexico
- Ohio State University
- Oxford
- Pakistan
- United States Senate
- Russia
- Ronald Reagan
- Nobel Peace Prize
- Soviet Union
- Hoover Institution
- United Kingdom
Opposing perspectives
Place in the tradition
Part of Bertrand Russell.