PhiloWikiConceptsPhilosophersBooksInteractive graph

Concept

Philosophical pluralism

Overview

philosophical theory

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

Possible passages

Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.

  1. That far off ideal is the motive power of philosophic research; and claims allegiance even as you expel it. The philosophic pluralist is a strict logician; the Hegelian thrives on contradictions by the help of his absolute; the Mohammedan divine bows before the creative will of Allah; and the pragmatist will swallow anything so long as it 'works.'

    Alfred North Whitehead, The Concept of Nature The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College, November 1919

    States what Philosophical pluralism is.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  2. A conclusion of this sort, based upon an extremely abstract argument, makes it natural to suspect that there is some error in the argument. Pluralism is the view of science and common sense, and is therefore to be accepted if the arguments against it are not conclusive. For my part, I have no doubt whatever that it is the true view, and that monism is derived from a faulty logic inspired by mysticism.

    Bertrand Russell, Philosophy

    Close in meaning to Philosophical pluralism; the term itself is not named.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  3. Pluralism believes in truth and reason, but only as mystically realized, as lived in experience. Up from the breast of a man, up to his tongue and brain, comes a free and strong determination, and he cries, originally, and in spite of his whole nature and environment, 'I will.' This is the Jovian _fiat_, the pure…

    William James, Memories and Studies

    The author is tied to Philosophical pluralism in the knowledge graph.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Philosophers who discussed Philosophical pluralism

Related ideas

Place in the tradition

Part of Aesthetics.

Explore Philosophical pluralism in the interactive graph →