Concept

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Overview

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark U.S. federal statute that prohibits racial discrimination in voting. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the civil rights movement on August 6, 1965. Congress later amended the act five times to expand its protections. Designed to enforce voting rights protected by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the act sought to secure the right to vote for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the act is considered to be the most effective piece of federal civil rights legislation ever enacted. The National Archives and Records Administration stated: "The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the most significant statutory change in the relationship between the federal and state governments in the area of voting since the Reconstruction period after the Civil War".

The act contains numerous provisions that regulate elections. Its "general provisions" provide nationwide protections for voting rights. Section 2 prohibits state and local government from imposing rules that restrict the right of citizens to vote on account of race, color or membership in a language minority group. Other provisions outlaw literacy tests and similar devices that were historically used to disenfranchise racial minorities. The act also contains "special provisions" that apply to jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting, such as the Section 5 preclearance requirement, which prohibits those jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting without first receiving confirmation from the U.S. attorney general or the U.S. District Court for D.C. that the change does not discriminate against protected minorities.

The Roberts Court has substantially weakened the Voting Rights Act in a series of rulings. In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the court nullified preclearance for states with a history of racial discrimination in voting, reasoning that it was obsolete. The jurisdictions which had previously been covered by preclearance subsequently enacted cuts to early voting, purges of voter rolls, and imposition of strict voter ID laws, leading to substantial decreases in African American voter turnout. In Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021), the court substantially weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. In Louisiana v. Callais (2026), the court again significantly weakened Section 2, increasing the requirements for vote dilution claims and stating that said claims must be decoupled from permissible partisan gerrymandering, per the court's decision in Rucho v. Common Cause. In her dissent, Justice Kagan referred to the decision as the "now-completed demolition of the Voting Rights Act."

Research showed that the act had successfully and massively increased voter turnout and voter registrations, in particular among Black people. The act has also been linked to concrete outcomes, such as greater public goods provision (such as public education) for areas with higher Black population shares, more members of Congress who vote for civil rights-related legislation, and greater Black representation in local offices.

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

Possible passages

Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.

For though where the people are governed by an Assembly, chosen by themselves out of their own number, the government is called a Democracy, or Aristocracy; yet when they are governed by an Assembly, not of their own choosing, ’tis a Monarchy; not of One man, over another man; but of one people, over another people. Of The Right Of Succession Of all these Formes of Government, the matter being mortall, so that not…
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan
States what Voting Rights Act of 1965 is.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader
These twofold requisites are not fulfilled by the expedient of a limitation of the suffrage, involving the compulsory exclusion of any portion of the citizens from a voice in the representation. Among the foremost benefits of free government is that education of the intelligence and of the sentiments which is carried down to the very lowest ranks of the people when they are called to take a part in acts which…
John Stuart Mill, Considerations on Representative Government
States what Voting Rights Act of 1965 is.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader
All others, not herein elsewhere excluded, who may elect, shall be capable of being elected thereto. Any member of the said assembly accepting any office of profit under this State, or the United States, or any of them, shall thereby vacate his seat, but shall be capable of being re-elected. Vacancies occasioned by such disqualifications, by death, or otherwise, shall be supplied by the electors, on a writ from the…
Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 8
Close in meaning to Voting Rights Act of 1965; the term itself is not named.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Related ideas

Place in the tradition

Part of Liberalism.

Explore Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the interactive graph →