Claim
Belief

Overview
A belief is a subjective attitude that something is true or a state of affairs is the case. A subjective attitude is a mental state of having some stance, take, or opinion about something. In epistemology, philosophers use the term belief to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false. To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few individuals carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise the next morning, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g., a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g., a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").
There are various ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam). Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to the notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace the bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?", "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?", "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?", and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?"
Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).
In the original texts
Passages from public-domain books where Belief is discussed.
If I say "Caesar conquered Gaul," a person who knows the meaning of the three words composing my statement knows as much as can be known about the nature of the objective which would make my statement true. It is clear that the objective reference of a belief is, in general, in some way derivative from the meanings of the words or images that occur in its content. There are, however, certain complications which must…
Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Mind
names the idea; a chapter is titled for it; states what it is; opens on it
He observes the symptoms, and concludes, according to the best of his judgement, that it is a case of phthisis. His belief is, even in his own judgement, only contingent: another man might, perhaps come nearer the truth. Such a belief, contingent indeed, but still forming the ground of the actual use of means for the attainment of certain ends, I term Pragmatical belief.
Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason
names the idea; a chapter is titled for it; states what it is; opens on it
This may be made clear by examples. Othello believes falsely that Desdemona loves Cassio. We cannot say that this belief consists in a relation to a single object, 'Desdemona's love for Cassio', for if there were such an object, the belief would be true. There is in fact no such object, and therefore Othello cannot have any relation to such an object. Hence his belief cannot possibly consist in a relation to this…
Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy
names the idea; states what it is; opens on it
The essence of belief is the establishment of a habit, and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action to which they give rise. If beliefs do not differ in this respect, if they appease the same doubt by producing the same rule of action, then no mere differences in the manner of consciousness of them can make them different beliefs, any more…
Charles S. Peirce, Chance, Love, and Logic
names the idea; states what it is; opens on it
_Gor._ I think that you are quite right, Socrates. _Soc._ Then let me raise another question; there is such a thing as ‘having learned’? _Gor._ Yes. _Soc._ And there is also ‘having believed’? _Gor._ Yes. [Sidenote: Knowledge and belief are not the same things; for there may be a false belief, but not a false knowledge.] _Soc._ And is the ‘having learned’ the same as ‘having believed,’ and are learning and belief…
Plato, The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2
names the idea; states what it is; author linked in the graph
Philosophers who discussed Belief
- Ludwig Wittgenstein
- Leucippus
- Edmund Gettier
- David Malet Armstrong
- Jaegwon Kim
- Timothy Williamson
- Ferdinand Tönnies
- Roderick Chisholm
- Jerry Fodor
- Allan Gibbard
- G. E. M. Anscombe
- Islam
- Edmund Husserl
- Charles Renouvier
- The End of Faith
- J. L. Schellenberg
- Hans Blumenberg
- Duncan Pritchard
- Elliot N. Dorff
- Zera Yacob (philosopher)
- Hannes Leitgeb
- Michael Williams (philosopher)
Related ideas
- Eastern Orthodox Church
- Ritual
- Emotion
- Force
- Hinduism
- Hindus
- Philosophy
- Abrahamic religions
- Ireland
- If and only if
- Atheism
- Intuition
- Truth value
- Ancient Greek philosophy
- Viktor Frankl
- Christians
- Intentionality
- Mass
- Stoicism
- Functionalism (philosophy of mind)
- Monotheism
- Muslims
- New religious movement
- Evidence
Place in the tradition
Part of Absurdism.