PhiloWikiConceptsPhilosophersBooksInteractive graph

Concept

Evidence

Evidence
Jan-Herm Janßen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · source

Overview

anything presented in support of an assertion

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

In the original texts

Passages from public-domain books where Evidence is discussed.

  1. That there are such cases, no one is likely to dispute. Assertions for which there is abundant positive evidence are often disbelieved, on account of what is called their improbability, or impossibility. And the question for consideration is what, in the present case, these words mean, and how far and in what circumstances the properties which they express are sufficient grounds for disbelief. § 2. It is to be…

    John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive

    names the idea; states what it is

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  2. Part of this circumstantial evidence is found in so-called scientific control, that is, the evidence that conditions were such that similar experiences could happen to others and could be described as they are described in the account given. Other parts of this evidence which we call corroborative are found in the statements of others which bear out details of this peculiar event, though it is important to note that…

    John Dewey, Creative Intelligence

    names the idea; states what it is; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  3. One important point about self-evidence is made clear by the case of memory, and that is, that self-evidence has degrees: it is not a quality which is simply present or absent, but a quality which may be more or less present, in gradations ranging from absolute certainty down to an almost imperceptible faintness. Truths of perception and some of the principles of logic have the very highest degree of self-evidence…

    Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy

    names the idea; states what it is; author linked in the graph; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  4. Again, self-evidence must not be the same thing as the absence of doubt or the presence of complete certainty. If we are completely certain of a proposition, we do not seek a ground to support our belief. If self-evidence is alleged as a ground of belief, that implies that doubt has crept in, and that our self-evident proposition has not wholly resisted the assaults of scepticism. To say that any given person…

    Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Mind

    names the idea; states what it is; author linked in the graph; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  5. I could not know, for instance, without some such evidence, such a fact as that Julius Caesar was murdered. For such a fact I must, in the first instance, have the evidence of other persons; and if I am to know that their evidence is trustworthy, I must have some ground in experience for supposing it to be so. There are, therefore, some kinds of facts which we cannot know without the evidence of experience and…

    G. E. Moore, Philosophical Studies

    names the idea; states what it is; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Philosophers who discussed Evidence

Related ideas

Opposing perspectives

Place in the tradition

Part of Agnosticism.

Explore Evidence in the interactive graph →