PhiloWikiConceptsPhilosophersBooksInteractive graph

Concept

Informal logic

Informal logic
original raster version: Farcaster recreated English vector version: Nyq · CC BY-SA 4.0 · source

Overview

Informal logic encompasses the principles of logic and logical thought outside of a formal setting (characterized by the usage of particular statements). However, the precise definition of "informal logic" is a matter of some dispute. Ralph H. Johnson and J. Anthony Blair define informal logic as "a branch of logic whose task is to develop non-formal standards, criteria, procedures for the analysis, interpretation, evaluation, criticism and construction of argumentation." This definition reflects what had been implicit in their practice and what others were doing in their informal logic texts.

Informal logic is associated with informal fallacies, critical thinking, the thinking skills movement and the interdisciplinary inquiry known as argumentation theory. Frans H. van Eemeren writes that the label "informal logic" covers a "collection of normative approaches to the study of reasoning in ordinary language that remain closer to the practice of argumentation than formal logic."

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

Possible passages

Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.

  1. No; the name mathematicians give it would suffice to prove this. In mathematics logic is called _analysis_ and analysis means _division_, _dissection_. It can have, therefore, no tool other than the scalpel and the microscope. Thus logic and intuition have each their necessary rôle. Each is indispensable.

    Henri Poincaré, The Foundations of Science

    States what Informal logic is.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  2. A distinct idea is defined as one which contains nothing which is not clear. This is technical language; by the _contents_ of an idea logicians understand whatever is contained in its definition. So that an idea is _distinctly_ apprehended, according to them, when we can give a precise definition of it, in abstract terms. Here the professional logicians leave the subject; and I would not have troubled the reader…

    Charles S. Peirce, Chance, Love, and Logic

    States what Informal logic is.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  3. (2) Logic is the study of thought pure and simple, or of the pure thought-forms. In the ordinary sense of the term, by thought we generally represent to ourselves something more than simple and unmixed thought; we mean some thought, the material of which is from experience. Whereas in logic a thought is understood to include nothing else but what depends on thinking and what thinking has brought into existence. It…

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, The Logic of Hegel

    States what Informal logic is.

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Philosophers who discussed Informal logic

Related ideas

Opposing perspectives

Place in the tradition

Part of Inference.

Explore Informal logic in the interactive graph →