Concept

Labor theory of value

Overview

The labor theory of value (LTV) posits that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the socially necessary labor time required to produce it under prevailing conditions. The theory is usually associated with Marxism, although versions of it were originally used by classical economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo to explain the long-run "natural price" of commodities. For Karl Marx, the LTV was not primarily a theory of relative prices but a tool to explain the social dynamics of capitalism.

Smith argued that a commodity's value was determined by the amount of labor it could command in exchange, while also suggesting that in primitive societies it was regulated by the labor embodied in its production. Ricardo developed a more consistent theory based solely on the quantity of labor embodied in a commodity. Marx built upon and radically transformed the classical theory, making it the cornerstone of his critique of political economy. He argued that value is a social relation specific to commodity-producing societies, with its substance being abstract labor—undifferentiated human labor whose magnitude is determined by the average labor-time required for production under normal conditions.

The development of the LTV from the late 17th century reflected the rise of capitalism and the increasing focus on the sphere of production rather than exchange. Classical economists used the theory to analyze the distribution of the social product between different classes in the form of wages, profit, and rent. Marx extended this analysis to develop his theory of surplus value, which holds that profit originates from the exploitation of workers, whose unpaid labor is appropriated by capitalists. The theory also underpins his concept of commodity fetishism, whereby the social relations of production are obscured and appear as objective, natural relations between things.

From the late 19th century, the LTV was largely supplanted in mainstream neoclassical economics by the theory of marginal utility. It has faced persistent critiques, notably from the Austrian School and neo-Ricardian economics, which focus on the "transformation problem" of reconciling values with prices. The LTV continues to be a foundation of Marxian economics, with modern debates often centering on whether it should be understood as a direct theory of price determination or as a framework for understanding the contradictory social form of labor under capitalism. Different schools of thought, such as value-form theory and the Temporal Single-System Interpretation, offer varying interpretations of its purpose and validity.

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

Possible passages

Found by search and not yet checked by a person; they may only mention the idea in passing.

To make the matter more explicit, a peasant produces say twenty hectolitres of wheat in a year. During this time he consumes a sum of values which may be expressed by fifteen hectolitres. Then the twenty hectolitres have the same value as the fifteen in the same market under identical conditions. In other words 20 equals 15. And this is called political economy!
Friedrich Engels, Landmarks of Scientific Socialism
States what Labor theory of value is; the author is tied to Labor theory of value in the knowledge graph.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader
But to the owner of the other commodity it is a commodity only in so far as it is a use-value to him, and it becomes an exchange value to its owner only in so far as it is a commodity to that other person. Thus, the same relation appears as a proportion between commodities as magnitudes of the same denomination, but differing qualitatively; or, as an expression of their equivalence as embodiments of universal…
Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
The author is tied to Labor theory of value in the knowledge graph.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader
In bourgeois society living labor is but a means to increase accumulated labor. In Communist society accumulated labor is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the laborer. In bourgeois society, therefore, the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past. In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent…
Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party
States what Labor theory of value is; the author is tied to Labor theory of value in the knowledge graph.
Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Labor theory of value

Overview

Possible passages

Philosophers who discussed Labor theory of value

Related ideas

Opposing perspectives

Place in the tradition