PhiloWikiConceptsPhilosophersBooksInteractive graph

Concept

Maxim (philosophy)

Maxim (philosophy)
The original uploader was Magnus Manske at English Wikipedia. Later versions were uploaded by Optimager at en.wikipedia. · Public domain · source

Overview

concise expression of a fundamental moral rule

Overview adapted from Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 4.0; see the article history for authors).

In the original texts

Passages from public-domain books where Maxim (philosophy) is discussed.

  1. It follows incontestably that, to whatever laws any rational being may be subject, he being an end in himself must be able to regard himself as also legislating universally in respect of these same laws, since it is just this fitness of his maxims for universal legislation that distinguishes him as an end in himself; also it follows that this implies his dignity (prerogative) above all mere physical beings, that he…

    Immanuel Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

    names the idea; states what it is; author linked in the graph; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  2. Practical laws, in so far as they are subjective grounds of actions, that is, subjective principles, are termed maxims. The judgements of moral according to in its purity and ultimate results are framed according ideas; the observance of its laws, according to maxims. The whole course of our life must be subject to moral maxims; but this is impossible, unless with the moral law, which is a mere idea, reason connects…

    Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason

    states what it is; names the idea; author linked in the graph; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  3. The popular objection to casuistry is similar to the popular objection to the maxim that the end justifies the means. It is creditable to practical moral sense, but not to popular logical consistency. For recourse to casuistry is the only conclusion which can be drawn from belief in fixed universal principles, just as the Jesuit maxim is the only conclusion proper to be drawn from belief in fixed ends. Every act…

    John Dewey, Human Nature and Conduct

    states what it is; names the idea; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  4. If now the maxims of rational beings are not by their own nature coincident with this objective principle, then the necessity of acting on it is called practical necessitation, i. e., duty. Duty does not apply to the sovereign in the kingdom of ends, but it does to every member of it and to all in the same degree.

    Michel de Montaigne, Literary and Philosophical Essays

    names the idea; states what it is

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

  5. The besetting sin of the maxim-writer is to exaggerate one side of a matter by neglecting another; to secure point and emphasis of style, by limiting the range of thought; and hence it is that most maxims present but a portion of truth and cannot be received unqualified. They must often be brought back to the test of life itself, and confronted and compared with other sides of the experience they profess to embody.

    Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Maxims and Reflections

    names the idea; the book is about it; opens on it

    Read the chapter · Open in the reader

Philosophers who discussed Maxim (philosophy)

Related ideas

Place in the tradition

Part of Deontology.

Explore Maxim (philosophy) in the interactive graph →